Skip to main content

Movement

3.5.2 Junction design principles

Junctions vary in importance, depending on their place in the network and the type of streets which they serve. In this code we refer to three junction categories: Principal, Primary and Secondary Residential and Tertiary Residential.

Principal Junctions

These are the most important junctions, with the highest levels of movement and activity. They are typically between:

  • Two or more Principal Streets
  • Principal and/or Secondary Residential Streets

Residential Junctions

These junctions connect streets lower in the hierarchy. They are typically between Principal and Secondary Residential Streets.

Tertiary Residential Junctions

This refers to any other junction typology, such as between Secondary Residential and Tertiary, or two Tertiary streets.

Design Principles

The following design principles apply to junctions:

MUST

Junctions must be designed to accommodate all users, including pedestrians, wheelers and cyclists, and, where relevant, buses.

SHOULD

For all junctions, designers should consider the surrounding context. Buildings should be used to define the junction, with frontages facing the junction and clear boundaries between public and private space.

If the junction geometry results in left over space, this should be used for greenery (including SuDS or trees) or public space. Excess paving or amenity grass should be avoided.

SHOULD

Special consideration should be given to Primary Junctions. These should incorporate the following characteristics:

  • Public space that could include greenery, street trees and places to sit and gather.
  • Taller buildings, as a minimum three storeys, or one storey higher than surrounding buildings.
  • Mixed use buildings, with active frontages, or a passive provision for future non residential uses on the ground floor.
COULD

Any junction could be designed to provide a green space or public square with planting and seating. This could have a formal or informal layout. This includes parking squares (refer to section 3.9).

COULD

The junction geometry could be used to create corner buildings. This would make more efficient use of space, and provides opportunities for irregular shaped buildings that can act as landmarks and add to the character of the development.

4.100 Continuous crossing - Retrofit (Hackney) image
An example of a retrofit swale planted in 'leftover space' at a junction.

Cycle Junctions and Crossings

Junctions can be the most hazardous and intimidating parts of the street network for cyclists and pedestrians. Between 2015 and 2020, around 71% of cycle casualties occurred at or within 20m of a junction, with the highest proportion being at T, Y or staggered junctions (Department for Transport - Reported Road Casualties Great Britain: Pedal Cycle Factsheet 2020.) An unsafe junction, either perceived or actual, will deter people from cycling and sever the wider network, regardless of the quality of the adjoining routes.

Junctions should either be designed to separate cycle and motor traffic, or to reduce traffic speed and volume and make it safe for these different traffic streams to mix.

General requirements

The following rules apply to junctions:

MUST

Where there is segregated cycle provision on the street, this protected infrastructure provision must continue through any junctions or crossings. This could consist of either physical segregation or segregation by time, for example by using a dedicated 'cycle only' phase for signals.

MUST

Where a segregated cycle lane is provided, priority crossings must be used on lower order side streets. For new streets, priority crossings must be in the form of a continuous crossing set at the level of the pavement. Refer to Section 3.5.6.

4.101 Continuous Crossing image
Example of a continuous crossing with cycle and pedestrian priority.